Next: Utility Functions
Up: Two Competing Companies Insuring
Previous: Two Competing Companies Insuring
First we fix the initial values, the "Contract-Vector"
. The transformed values, the
"Fraud-Vector"
, are obtained by
maximizing the utilities
and
respectively.
The maximization is
performed under the assumption that partners
honor the contract
 |
|
|
(37) |
 |
|
|
(38) |
Formally, condition (22) transforms the vector
into the vector
. To make expressions
shorter denote this transformation by
 |
|
|
(39) |
One may obtain the equilibrium at the fixed point
, where
 |
|
|
(40) |
The fixed point
exists, if the feasible set
is convex
and all the profit functions are convex
[2]. We obtain the equilibrium directly by
iterations (23), if the transformation
is contracting
[4]. If not, then we minimize the square deviation
 |
|
|
(41) |
The equilibrium is achieved, if the minimum (25)
is zero. If the minimum (25) is positive then the equilibrium does not exist. That is a theoretical conclusion.
In statistical modeling, some deviations are inevitable. Therefore,
we assume that the equilibrium exists, if the minimum is
not greater then modeling errors.
The problem can be directly extended to
competing companies
and
individually insured objects. The only obstacle is dimensionality
of related optimization problem. For example, in this case one
searches for equilibrium of four variables
where variables
are controlled by customers
responding to insurance charges
that are defined by coresponding insurance companies.
Next: Utility Functions
Up: Two Competing Companies Insuring
Previous: Two Competing Companies Insuring
2002-11-04